Is this what we really want? |
I attended a forum on Wednesday evening around engagement hosted
by the LGA and DPTI. the paper presented on consultation really had it all and
there is little need to change anything. However, what is actually happening
regarding consultation does not reflect the well thought out plans.
In the recent Ministerial DPA
the Minister, John Rau, has identified sites he thinks are project ready on the
main transport corridors. Some of these are in Unley and residents have been
given an opportunity to have their say. And this they have done. At least half
the representations received were concerning only one site and this is in
Unley. The problem is that there are other sites that their owners think are
also project ready but Mr Rau did not include them in the DPA. But he has
allowed these sites to make submissions for inclusion. What next, it a truly
consultative manner he would ensure that these sights, if suitable, are
included in a further list of properties and not in this one. However, he has
failed to give any surety to residents that this will be the case. This asks
the questions;
How were the original sites
selected?
How will future sites be
selected?
What’s wrong with allowing
Councils to continue to write their own DPAs and to consult with their
residents directly?
Why allow Councils to spend
working time on producing a document that Mr Rau agreed on and then change the
rules to suit yourself?
No comments:
Post a Comment