Published in this week's Eastern Herald.
Councillors
are elected because they are people who will act responsibly, have an interest
in the Council area, working with people and problem solving.
We get
voted into the job and we vote on every decision that needs to be made at
Council.
I’d like to
explore in this article what goes into making that decision.
Many
matters are raised by residents, followed up my questions on notice, a motion
on notice and then debated at Council. But
what evidence do we look for in making these decisions? At last month’s Council
meeting we had three decisions that were likely to be contentious. The first was
to progress a Sensory Garden (to be donated by a well-meaning Rotary club) to
consultation and design following this consultation. We received maybe a dozen
emails from residents aghast at the
concept and there were 20-25 residents at the meeting when there’s
usually only a few. The alternate motion to not proceed was resoundly
supported.
Later in
the same evening we considered The Climate and Energy Plan for which there were quite a
few submissions including one with 70+ signatures. When it came to
debating the plan an alternate motion was put to Councillors that we had not
had time to consider the implication of bringing forward Carbon neutrality to
2022 from the proposed 2030. After much
debate this motion was passed but not unanimously. I was taken aback that while
we had all considered the people present, we had trouble determining the value
of double that number when in a written submission.
Again, on
the same evening we had to again vote on the number of elected members Council
would have moving forward. We went out to consultation suggesting 10+1, two less
that we now have. In the meantime, the parliament deleted a clause from
legislation that would now allow 13 people on Council, so it was now legally
possible to keep the status quo. With only a handful of representations (34) we
made a decision to stay as we are. With just .12% of the ratepayers having a
say we changed our minds even though the majority of these favoured a smaller
Council. What would have been the result if the losing side had gathered a few
friends to attend the meeting! The research is clear smaller council numbers
made better decisions.
In recent
decisions that have gone to consultation Council received 3 responses for The
Budget, 21 for the Cultural Plan and 173 for The Living Well Plan. We need to
generate more ways to make consultation authentic, informative if we are to make
decisions based on the results.
No comments:
Post a Comment